Local MP Scott Reid Releases C-6 Riding Referendum ResultsJune 22, 2021
For immediate release
This afternoon, local MP Scott Reid voted in favour of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), in accordance with his publicly-stated commitment to vote as instructed by the voters of Lanark-Frontenac-Kingston in this, his eleventh “Constituency Referendum.”
A majority of votes received at Reid’s constituency office answered “Yes” to the question, “Should Scott Reid, MP vote for Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy)?”
Mr. Reid received 3,652 votes, of which 3,607 were valid votes (45 were spoiled). The Yes votes totalled 2,484 (69%), and the No votes totalled 1,123 (31%).
This has been Reid’s eleventh Riding Referendum since he was first elected in 2000, and it is the tenth which determined how he would vote on a piece of parliamentary business. Reid has always voted according to the will of the majority of votes cast – even if it has meant voting against many of his caucus colleagues, or against his own preference. The results of all previous riding referenda can be found at: www.scottreid.ca/category/constituency-referenda/.
“This is the same manner in which I have dealt with bills of a profoundly moral nature, including The Civil Marriage Act (ie. same-sex marriage), in 2005, two bills on medical assistance in dying, and the Cannabis Act in 2017,” Reid stated.
“The people that I represent in the House of Commons have consciences of their own, which are just as good as those of the politicians; and they face none of the incentives to vote against their judgment or conscience that can face a politician. For this reason, it has been my practice to defer to the judgment of the people who elected me, when voting on such crucial matters.”
Mr. Reid mailed a paper flyer in January, intended for each household in his constituency, and provided an electronic copy of his referendum flyer and additional information for his constituents on a dedicated page of his website, at: www.scottreid.ca/BillC-6. Ballots could be returned by postal mail or email (via a photo or scanned copy of a completed ballot paper). The vast majority were returned by email. Every ballot received before 3:00pm today, June 22, 2021, was counted. The bill was passed by the House of Commons by a vote of 263 to 63, and will now be sent to the Senate.
For more information, please contact:
Office of Scott Reid, M.P,
Carleton Place: 613-257-8130 | Tollfree: 1-866-277-1577
When did Scott Reid announce he would hold a riding referendum on Bill C-6?
Scott Reid launched his C-6 riding referendum, and companion resource webpage, in late January, 2021: https://scottreid.ca/BillC-6/.
What other constituency referenda has Scott Reid conducted in the past? The vote on Bill C-6 is the eleventh constituency referendum that Scott Reid has launched since his election in 2000. The results of each previous riding referendum can be found at: www.scottreid.ca/category/constituency-referenda/.
The first referendum, in August 2001, asked constituents whether Scott should opt out of a proposed $21, 000 MP pay raise, or opt in and give the money to charity. 83% of respondents directed Scott Reid to opt in and give the raise to charity. Scott Reid has followed up by donating $21, 000 for CPR training and the purchase of defibrillators for local emergency services, each year since 2001.
The second referendum, in October 2001, asked constituents how Scott Reid should vote on Bill C-5, the Species at Risk Act. 65% of participants voted to support the bill, and he accordingly voted in favour of the bill at Third Reading.
The third referendum was conducted in November 2001, and asked voters whether or not Scott Reid should support Bill C-36, the Anti-Terrorism Act. 73% of respondents directed him to vote against the bill, which he did when the bill came to Third Reading in Parliament.
The fourth referendum took place in October 2002, asking constituents their opinion on the Electoral Boundary Commission’s decision to alter the federal constituency boundaries. 84% of respondents voted to maintain the boundaries of Lanark County within the riding, and 79% voted to include Smiths Falls in the same electoral district as Lanark County. Scott Reid presented these results to the Commission, requesting its decision reflect the stated views of his constituents. When the Commission ignored the request to keep Lanark County united, Scott Reid petitioned to overturn the decision. In 2015, this resulted in the reuniting of Lanark County within a single electoral district.
The fifth referendum took place in 2005, asking voters whether or not Scott Reid should support the Civil Marriage Act, which redefined marriage to include same-sex unions. 9,176 voters participated. 80% were opposed to the redefinition of marriage and 20% were in favour of the redefinition of marriage. Scott Reid, accordingly, voted against Bill C-38 at third reading.
The sixth referendum took place in 2012, asking voters whether or not Scott Reid should support Motion M-312, which called for the formation of a House of Commons committee “to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth”. This motion was argued by some to constitute a reopening of the debate over abortion in Canada. 65% of respondents voted for Scott Reid to oppose the motion, with 35% voting to support it. Scott Reid respected the decision of his constituents, and voted against Motion M-312.
The seventh referendum took place in the spring of 2016, asking voters whether Scott Reid should vote for or against Bill C-14, which provided for medically-assisted suicide for adults with grievous and irremediable medical conditions, in an advanced state of irreversible decline. 67% of respondents voted for Scott Reid to support the bill, with 32% voting to oppose it. Scott Reid respected the decision of his constituents, and voted yes to Bill C-14.
The eighth referendum took place in the fall of 2016, asking voters whether they wanted the Liberal government to call a national referendum before changing the federal voting system. 89% of respondents voted in favour of the government holding a national referendum before changing the voting system. In the Fall of 2016, Scott Reid convinced the majority of the House of Commons Special Committee on Electoral Reform to recommend a national referendum on changing the voting system. In February 2017, the government decided to give up on changing the voting system.
The ninth referendum took place in the fall of 2017, asking voters whether Scott Reid should vote for or against Bill C-45, which amended Canada’s laws to legalize and regulate the recreational use of marijuana (also known as cannabis). 55% of respondents voted for Scott Reid to support the bill, with 45% voting to oppose it. Scott Reid respected the decision of his constituents, and voted yes to Bill C-45.
The tenth referendum took place in the fall of 2020, asking voters whether Scott Reid should vote for Bill C-7, an update to the Medical Assistance in Dying Act. 52.5% of respondents voted for Scott Reid to support the bill, with 47.5% voting against it. Scott Reid followed the decision of the majority of his responding constituents and voted yes to Bill C-7.
How does the Constituency Referendum on Bill C-6 work? Every household in Lanark-Frontenac-Kingston was sent a multi-page flyer, each containing four ballots. Eligible voters were invited to answer the question: “Should Scott Reid, MP vote for Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy)?” The flyer included an explanation of Bill C-6, along with prominent arguments for and against the bill, as well as information for advocacy websites that can be browsed for more information. Mr. Reid provided a page on his website (www.scottreid.ca/BillC-6) with an electronic version of his flyer, and links to information on the bill and debate in the House of Commons. Ballots could be returned by postal mail or by email (via a photo or scanned copy of a completed ballot form from his flyer). The vast majority of ballots were returned by email.
The actual mailing of the flyer is conducted by Canada Post, and is handled as “unaddressed” mail – so that every household should receive a copy, rather than individual constituents. Since correspondence to Members of Parliament can be sent postage-free, constituents who participate in the referendum do not have to affix a stamp to their reply, should they choose to return their ballot by postal mail.
How do you ensure the process will be impartial? Scott Reid has designed his ballot forms, for this referendum and for previous referenda, on the model of the impartial voter information booklets that have been sent to voters in state referenda in Washington State, California, and Switzerland.
Why are voters asked to include their name and address on each ballot? Respondents are asked to include their address and the names of each participating voter on their ballot, so that it can be confirmed that each vote originated from within the constituency and from an individual eligible to vote in elections (as per the Elections Canada list of electors). The contents of each individual ballot will be kept in strict confidence, the ballots will be kept in a secure location, and every ballot will be destroyed following the House of Commons vote.
What are the rules for the Constituency Referendum? The following rules were contained on the ballot form:
1) Each REGISTERED VOTER in the household may vote once.
2) Ballots will be reviewed against the current Elections Canada voter’s list. If more votes per ballot are cast than the number of voters residing at that address, all of the votes will be disregarded. (All voters residing at an address do not need to participate).
3) To prevent multiple voting, please give your name(s) & address below. By law, your data cannot be divulged.
4) For security, ballots will be destroyed following the vote in the House of Commons.
How will you determine if votes are spoiled or ineligible? Some may be invalid due to voter ineligibility (no name(s) provided, out-of-riding address, no address). Others may be invalid because it is not possible to determine the voting intention of the voter(s). For example, some voters have, in the past, failed to mark either a “Yes” or a “No”, or have marked both, while others provide written comments only.
Isn’t a constituency referendum an extra cost for the taxpayer? Every Member of Parliament is permitted to send four “householder” mailings to their constituency per year, as the costs are already provided for by parliamentary budgets. Most MPs use this allocation to send calendars or holiday greetings to their constituents. As a means of giving his constituents a greater say in issues facing Parliament, Scott Reid has chosen instead to use some of his householder allotments to ask voters how he should vote on specific issues.
Posted in: News